The Great Economic Unravelling
How the Shock Doctrine is hollowing out our nation and our future
By Dr Harpreet Singh | drhsinghnz.substack.com | FB: @DrHSinghNZ | BSky: @DrHSinghNZ | IG: @DrHSinghNZ
True radicalism does not always arrive with a bang. Often, it arrives as a quiet series of erasures until the country you once knew has been edited out of existence. -Dr Harpreet Singh
Aotearoa stands at a critical turning point as the nation grapples with a fundamental shift in how it is governed. Across the country, a fierce debate is raging over whether the government is simply fixing a broken economy or if they are using a time of crisis to dismantle the foundations of our society. Many political experts point to a strategy called the Shock Doctrine. This theory explains how radical changes that the public would normally reject are pushed through while people are distracted or overwhelmed by a major crisis. In 2026, this strategy appears to be in full effect as power shifts away from the people and into the hands of private corporations.
The Anatomy of a Manufactured Crisis
To pass massive changes without a clear invitation from the voters, a government must first convince the public that the current system is in total collapse. This follows a deliberate three-stage process that begins by using alarming language like fiscal hole or economic catastrophe to create a sense of panic. Once the public is fearful, the government makes deep cuts to essential services like hospitals, schools, and public transport. As these services begin to fail and wait times grow, the public becomes frustrated and desperate for any solution. This is when the government steps in to offer privatisation or private sector partnerships as the only practical rescue. This sequence makes a political choice look like a necessary emergency fix.
Echoes of a Brutal Past
The changes we see today are deeply rooted in the radical reforms that scarred New Zealand at the end of the last century. In the 1980s, a movement known as Rogernomics used a sudden money crisis to tear apart the country’s old systems almost overnight. A decade later, the changes known as Ruthanasia used a surprise budget gap to justify savage cuts to welfare and support for the vulnerable. In 2026, many see the current coalition as the third wave of this movement. While the 1990s focused on selling off buildings and land, the current era is focused on changing the very rules of how our government is allowed to work.
The Quiet Death of the Public Service
Unlike the explosive changes of the 1990s, the current government uses a strategy called aggressive gradualism. This is a process of slow and constant erosion that is harder for the public to notice until it is too late. Instead of selling off assets in one go, they are hiring private companies to take over work that the public service used to do for everyone. They are also creating new laws that make it nearly impossible for future governments to protect workers or the environment. By cutting jobs one by one and underfunding departments until they can no longer function, the government is effectively hollowing out the state from the inside.
The Economic Cost for Māori
By the start of 2026, the economic fallout of these reforms has hit Māori whānau and the Māori economy with devastating force. Because Māori workers are so often on the front lines of the social services being cut, they have been the first to face the pain of job losses. Recent reports show that as the national economy struggles, the gap between Māori and non-Māori employment is widening once again. This hardship is made worse by new rules that make it harder to access financial support, which drains money from Māori households that were already struggling with the high cost of living.
This shift also represents a direct attack on Māori economic self-determination. A new model for social spending forces local iwi and community groups to compete against large, for-profit corporations for funding. This system often ignores the local knowledge of Māori groups in favour of big business interests. At the same time, new laws have made it easier for companies to start major projects like mining without properly talking to local Māori first. This prioritises short-term corporate profit over the long-term health of the land and water, which are the heart of the Māori economy.
The New Rules of the Game
Two major new laws are the engines driving this transformation. The first is the Regulatory Standards Act of 2025, which acts as a permanent filter for every new rule the government tries to make. If a proposed rule might cost a business money or interfere with property rights, it becomes nearly impossible to pass. This creates a legal wall against things like fair pay or environmental protection. The second tool is the Social Investment Model. This treats social help like a business investment. While it is marketed as a way to get better results, it often means the government stops caring for its people directly and instead pays private contractors to do the job for a profit.
Why It Matters
This transformation represents the permanent rewriting of the social contract that has defined NZ for generations. When public services are hollowed out and replaced by private interests, the primary goal of the state shifts from collective well-being to individual profit. Once the infrastructure of a caring society is dismantled, it cannot simply be rebuilt when the political wind changes. We are witnessing a fundamental move from a nation built on mutual support to a marketplace driven by competition. This leaves every citizen more exposed to the whims of the global economy and strips away the safety nets that once ensured no one was left behind in the pursuit of growth.


Cuts don’t help the economy at all. Only a wealthy person looking down or from a distance could think taking money away is the solution.
I’m a beneficiary raising a special needs kid and I’m close to retirement. This allows me time to reflect and it’s so obvious to me.
Putting billions into the economy instead of cancelling the pay agreements would have resulted in all that money being spent. Those women earned it. They’re unlikely to lock it away in shares or offshore bank accounts. .
It’s the hoarding of wealth. Banking and stacking and running businesses for profit only. Bailing when they make a loss is what the National govt do best.
They’re not good for us.
Great article, thank you